![Bloodshed dev c++ 5.11 Bloodshed dev c++ 5.11](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125759060/543162576.jpg)
As for the antivirus, that is slightly weird. I'll assume you are getting it from the Code::Blocks website, and you checked the md5 before running it. I, personally, have never had any security related problems with it, and I don't know of anyone that has, so unless a third party has injected a malicious executable into the file it should be fine.
Adding to what @MiiNiPaa said, I also prefer Code::Blocks because of the range of compilers it can integrate with. If you want, you can set it up to compile with clang instead, or even the MSVC compiler. The only thing I don't really like about Code::Blocks is the debugger: though it is still good (and perfectly adequate), it can't beat the Microsoft one. However, overall, I prefer Code::Blocks.
As for the compiler related problems with Dev-C++, you can normally fix these by simply updating the compiler. The most recent version of Bloodshed Dev-C++ (4.9.9.2 beta) came with a fairly old version of TDM MinGW from memory, so you can probably get a newer version that should fully support C++11. Then again, Dev-C++ isn't exactly a great compiler anyway, so you should probably still change.
Adding to what @MiiNiPaa said, I also prefer Code::Blocks because of the range of compilers it can integrate with. If you want, you can set it up to compile with clang instead, or even the MSVC compiler. The only thing I don't really like about Code::Blocks is the debugger: though it is still good (and perfectly adequate), it can't beat the Microsoft one. However, overall, I prefer Code::Blocks.
As for the compiler related problems with Dev-C++, you can normally fix these by simply updating the compiler. The most recent version of Bloodshed Dev-C++ (4.9.9.2 beta) came with a fairly old version of TDM MinGW from memory, so you can probably get a newer version that should fully support C++11. Then again, Dev-C++ isn't exactly a great compiler anyway, so you should probably still change.
C++ Compiler Bloodshed
Jul 06, 2009 Seriously. I want to stop trying to set things up and just get to learning and working with shit. This is probably futile because they are all different Dev-C is the most stripped down, but features this Devpack thing that not only no one uses, but doesn't do what it's meant to - make integrating and using libraries easy. Visual Studio (express?) is much heavier, but makes making forms. Also, wxDev-C is free and open source under the GPL. There are a lot of extensions made for it (although development for Dev-C is a bit dead atm). Visual C is only free for the Express version - if you need more, you need to pay for it. Dev-C is a free full-featured integrated development environment (IDE) distributed under the GNU General Public License for programming in C and C. It is written in Delphi. It is bundled with, and uses, the MinGW or TDM-GCC 64bit port of the GCC as its compiler.